I will say this OUR GOVERMENT DROPPED THE BALL on events leading up to 9/11 and we were caught snoozing. Of that there is NO DOUBT !

FIRE DOES'NT MELT STEEL ARE YOU KIDDING? Do you think stop signs,steel beams, car engines ARE JUST PULLED OUT OF THE GROUND. FIRE DOES,CAN,AND WILL MUNIPULATE STEEL
The testimony of the firefighters who made it out of tower one was that they didnt even get a chance to set up or access the fire before the evac call was broadcast and video shot from right underneith tower THE INSTANT BEFORE AND AS THE TOWER CAME DOWN RECORDED NO EXPLOSIONS BY AUDIO OR VIDEO AS IS THE SAME FOR WTC7. Tower 7 shows NO EXPLOSIONS ON ANY FLOOR before its collapse again not by video or audio. Also, fireman and building inspectors from FEMA both said that there was MASSIVE STRUCTURAL DAMAGE TO BUILDING SEVEN and order several evacuations of the area several times in fear of a collapes on building 7 as they were trying to fight fires on buildings 3,5,6

If there was debris in the lobby, could there also be debris on the floors below the impact zone and what would happen to that debris when the weight of the floors above it collapsed on it. It would get blown out ward Those are the explosions why was there no explosions above the impact zone. finally,if it was demolition why did the walls fall outward
As for Edna Cintron ( God rest her soul) the collapse debris is the answer the floors have fallen inside the hole youll notice a wall of debris behind her and hardly any smoke but the floors right above her and all around the other sides are still burning

hey reichstag
thanks for responding
1) one of two french film makers filming a documentry reported after entering the lobby of the first tower hit said there was a man on fire in front of an elevator from fire shooting down the shaft. If there were bombs set of in the basement why didnt the building fall then. The towers collapsed from top to bottom with the lower floors intact till the end of the collapse

The claims of Michael Springman, State Department veteran of the Jeddah visa bureau, that the CIA ran the office and issued visas to al Qaeda members so they could receive training in the United States, sound like the sour grapes of someone who was fired for making such wild accusations.

Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan's ISI, must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of 9/11, because I didn't read anything about him in the official report.

That Porter Goss met with Ahmed the morning of September 11 in his capacity as Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has no bearing whatsoever upon his recent selection by the White House to head the Central Intelligence Agency.

That FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds accuses the agency of intentionally fudging specific pre-9/11 warnings and harboring a foreign espionage ring in its translation department, and claims she witnessed evidence of the semi-official infrastructure of money-laundering and narcotics trade behind the attacks, is of no account, since John Ashcroft has gagged her with the rare invocation of "State Secrets Privilege," and retroactively classified her public testimony. For the sake of national security, let us speak no more of her.

911REICHSTAG (4 seconds ago)
1) I dont know I am not the one who claimed that those planes hit the buildings. Watch september clues 1-9 and make your own deduction.
2) the debris in the lobby was caused by damage from the basement bombs, see the testimony of William Rodriguez, 25 year WTC employee who witnessed pre-crash explosions in the basement.
3) This question does not make sense
4) No and it definitely could not melt steel (molten steel found under all 3 collapsed buildings) and how could the fires in the impact zone have been that hot when people were seen waving from the holes created by the airplanes (Edna Cintron) FIrefighters were able to reach the 78th floor and said they could "knock out the fire" with only 2 lines.
5) it certainly would not make all the ground floor supports collapse instantly and simultaneously. By the way what is your explanation for what happened to wtc7 which collapsed at free-fall speed and wasn't hit by an airplane.

So how about it reichstag, did you figure out the answers to my questions yet and are you willing to leave this post up for others.
If you forgot the questions here they are again
1 If it was a military jet, fighter jet or missle were is flight11 and 175 and ALL OF ITS PASSENGERS
2 If there was debris in the lobby of the towers AS IS DOCUMENTED could there be debris on the floors below the impact zone
3 what happens when a large heavy for is dropped on debris
4 can a fire,burning at 2000 degress for 60mins weaken steel
5 could the weight of twenty floors of an office building ( I.E. above the impact zone ) bend weaken steel beams
There is just some of them to chew on- look forward to hearing from you though i know you ll never answer them. The answers are obvious NO CONSPIRACY

You do realize that most historians have concluded that the Reichstag ACTUALLY was burned down by Communists? And that it wasn't a false-flag attack? Right?

The alleged Nazi who leaked about the Nazis burning it down turned out to be Albert Norden, the editor of the German Communist newspaper "Die Rote Fahne."

So if you're trying to portray 9/11 as a false-flag attack, the Reichstag Fire isn't an appropriate example. The Nazis didn't burn it down.