you have failed in whatever your aim was in making your five videos. lies cannot stand when bits of truth peck at it. in your last two comments you proved my point and the whole point of questioning the veracity of long held claims about 9/11. there are too many discrepancies and contradictions with the various explanations of 9/11, and with your weak explanations-which is the reason why it is easy to poke holes through your explanations. lies always need further and further explanation, which is why you are fading to black and shutting down.

why did you disable the comment function on your nose in nose out video? are you scared of the truth? are you afraid to be wrong?

your sept clues video has planes added....check my orginal raw footage in "911 wierd broadcast" and you will not see your 7.84 sec. plane.

only the most dumbest youtubers would believe in your bullshit theory. look at your comments, there are a lot of people that disagree with you. no ones got your back on your bullshit theory. and you didnt debunk anything. sorry take your shill ass back to school.
you got owned...!

LAWSON'S BULLSHIT IS SO FUCKING TRANSPARENT...
WE KNOW HE'S NOT BLIND...SO,
HE MUST BE A SHILL...
EZ
THATS WHY TV FAKERY IS THE BEST WAY TO WAKE UP NEWBIES.
THEY GET IT INSTANTLY...
WITHOUT A DOUBT ,THE SMOKINGEST GUNS OF THE WHOLE EVENT...
911 octopus part 8
911 amateur part 2
and
Super 'not it' Bros..

CFR SCUMBAG
tim russert
REST IN PISS

LAWSON,
GO FUCK YOURSELF...

SIMON SHACK,
EXCELLENT FUCKING WORK!!!

The laws of physics for idiots -
1) aluminum and compressed air cannot fully pennetrate concrete and steel ay ANY speed
2) max speed for a 767 at 700 feet altitude is 250 mph, not 550 (call boeing yourself)
3) the fake "planes" melt into the WTC and explode on the opposite side (no deceleration and no sound of impact)
4)16 different aircraft and 9 different approach paths in 24 seperate videos
If you believe this stupid story, you are no better than the ones who did this.

Then you agreed with the No Plane Conspiracy!? TV fakery and No Planers did believed that no Boeing or passenger planes crashed on 9/11 then what's the problem? September Clues had flaws but simon was portraying that analogy. Either 1)no Boeing passenger planes hit
2)plane look alike missile hit
3)nothing hit.

That is just the same theory as what you believed: remote controlled planes. Simonshack and No Planers believed NO BOEING PASSENGERS PLANE hit and videos were faked.

Cased closed and move on.......

You are doing a Great Job sir!

alawson911', I was just wondering if you believe that America was attacked by terrorists or power-hungry tyrants as your videos differ in opinion. You disproved 'September Clues' but also disproved WTC 7 collapsing due to 'fires'. What is your stance? Or do you sit on the fence, analyzing every fact yourself?

Cheers,
aSurlyPotato

hey, you do believe that 9/11 was an inside job, right? but why question or separate with the "no-planers" or "tv fakery"?
September Clues did not say that nothing hit the towers, just saying that the media fake the airplanes hitting the towers.

No Planers means no Boeing jet planes, so meaning, no planes were hijack (if you believe no planes hit pentagon and shanksville, but why believe in WTC), and what you saw on tv was covering up what hit or causing the towers to explode.

TV fakery is the best evidence that 9/11 was a cover up and WTC 7. Why you all 911 truth movement just unite and re investigate 9/11 to the public.